Your edit summary: "In episode 6x05, Bellamy finds the skeletons of children from the Mission Team Alpha, in the reliquary, meaning that they died during the first Red Sun. There were no descendants of the original Mission Team Alpha. I saw the video of first Red Sun.)"
The claim that "There were no descendants of the original Mission Team Alpha" is unproven.
Bellamy did find child skeletons, but this does not prove all the children from the original Mission Team Alpha died - only that some did. Nor does it prove that all survivors of the first red sun (whether child or adult) were sterile. Unless you can provide evidence that they were all sterile, you don't have proof that there were no descendants.
But most of the women from the original Mission Team Alpha were killed in the video I saw. Well, except for Priya. There were only three children in the Mission Team Alpha, and Bellamy found their skeletons he said are from the same mission team. There were only 13 members.
Priya Desai and Victor Lee already had children. Caleb was killed by Russell during the first Red Sun. I'm not sure if Russell and Victor Lee could or could not reproduce with women born from embryos, due to their age. Also, if Russell, Priya Desai and Victor Lee brought back their loved ones using human embryos with Nightblood, then they don't need children from themselves, but instead, they decide to grow old and die to be resurrected like their loved ones. They want immortality.
All of that speculation, leaving your claim unproven. As of right now "there were no descendants of the original Mission Team Alpha" can be called speculation or an assumption, but it is not fact or confirmed info.
even the previous sentence is bad written:
"n The Chosen, she is viewed as a traitor by Trikru because she was living with Skaikru, but most of the Sky People do not want her either and Geoff Hardy attempts to throw her outside when Octavia arrives stopping them and saves Niylah's life."
better OUT (not outside)
too long to tell a simple fact that Octavia gave Niylah a Skaicru spot!
could be Trivia: that in fact Clarke & Bellamy were NOT in the bunker and Niylah takes Clarke's spots
I am an engineer - means nothing in the fantasy world of good stories. Still ALL authors know that a good story MUST be consistant to itself and / or best to known physics too.
Here we go: real world basics - wounds are healing on living objects, true for fauna (human, animals) and flora (plants) - even on single cells (biological cells) there are natural mechanism to fix mistakes (wounds) in the DNA - time dilation and lenth contraction are 'welln-known' existing facts (to be tought at University level), introduced before Albert Einstein, but they were proven correct due the work on relativity theory by Albert Einstein
- 'old age' in a living object is an effect of over time summarized mistakes in the cell renewal process
- a living object - organism has a limited life time
Fantasy world 'the 100': - we only know the basic information which the authors deceide to tell us - true, we do assume that universal physical principles also do exist AND are applied to fantasy worlds like Sanctum - the temporal flare really seams to be a time-space disturbance, disturb in the fact that time gets accelerated - therefore any living object which touches the temopral flare dies due 'accelerated losing live time', to be shown as burned by a real flare - for a wound on a living object - true isolated to the wound - time acceleration is a positive effect - to remember: the tree sap itself has NO healing power - the tree sap just accelerates the natural healing process due time dilation
- this physic logic also explains why tree sap can NOT heal the old-age arm of Octavia, simple because it is NOT an effect of a wound but due the over time summarized mistake of cell renewal due exposure to the temporal flare.
We are all missing 'the magic' inside the Anomaly, which truely did heal (in term of undo, revert) the old-age arm of Octavia.
With pleasure I will watch again season 6 to recall all the dialogs.
Have a good time 'the 100' for ever the best series - Sci-Fi with real universal physics!
Please do a better job communicating with others. That is, if you disagree with someone's edit, go to their message wall and start a discussion. Avoid reverts except in clear-cut cases.
Eugene, I know you're trying to improve the wiki, but you have to work with, not against, the other editors. When I get complaints about a single user from multiple editors, the easiest solution is to block the problematic user – so if you don't want to be blocked, please make sure I don't get any more complaints.
I am aware Shelby Flannery was promoted to series regular, but she is still listed under Guest Starring on that page. So that's why I'm removing her from Guest Starring. Cause she's no longer recurring, but main. She's already listed under Starring. She's listed on there twice and I'm removing the one that no longer applies.
I am writting at the moment Season 6 - only Octavia story line for the German Wiki.
Today I might do episode 12 (to publish tomorrow), means tomorrow I wil watch 'blood of sanctum' and I can focus on Octavia AND on Gabriel.
There is currently 6 lines for 'blood of sanctum' how much lines is your goal
how you imagine to split the work?
Should I start at 1st minute or rather later like after 22nd minute (scene cut Emori closes the door)?
I like to do everyday a bit...... so I might will add a small text TODAY to Garbriel page.
I do speak Englisch everyday at home - but Englisch is not my 1st language (more like 3rd).
Eugene, part of working on a wiki is being able to cooperate with other users. It's about communication. If you can't engage with other users, than you need back off. Your reasoning was ridiculous and I asked you to desist. You have provided no valid reasoning, yet persisting in the edit war. If you can't communicate and can't back off, then you leave me no choice but to block you.
I don't have the ability to block someone from one page, so if I can't get a user to leave a page alone, I have to do a full wiki block. While the immediate issue is the James Crockett page, the bigger issue is your communication and behavior.
If this image scares you, haunts you, makes you cry, etc. than you should not be watching the show nor editing this wiki. But since you are watching the show and editing the wiki, your argument appears absurd. Regardless, we do not pick images based on those type of arguments, so you can't edit the wiki that way.
The current block is for 3 days. I'll release you from the current block, however:
Do not edit the images on the James Crockett page. Even if someone changes the infobox image back to the image you dislike, do not edit the page. However, you may engage in discussions on user walls or in the forum regarding those images. Edit summaries do not count as discussions.
Do not get into edit wars. If an edit gets reverted more than twice, than stop, do not re-revert. You may engage others on walls or in the forum, but do not edit the page to your preferred version. Get consensus, not continue edit warring. Again, edit summaries do not count as discussions.
Break the rules, I'll give you a week or longer block. Eugene, I know you contribute a lot to the wiki and this is important to you. However, this is a collaborative community - if you want to participate here, you must cooperate with others.
Hi Eugene, my understanding is that you and Wellsworth96 have been having an edit war over James Crockett's infobox image. Personally, I think neither image is optimal for the infobox; I'd prefer a high-quality, forward facing head shot. Wellsworth96 image has the advantage of being higher quality while yours is forward facing.
Regardless of that, I'm quite confused by your justification for your preferred image. You wrote: "I admit, this picture makes me angry, after the haunting memories of him torturing Octavia. I cannot let it be shown on the Category." Your feelings over a character or a specific scene are not valid justifications for why a specific image should or should not be used.
Here are a few examples of valid justifications for a preferred image: "higher quality image", "forward facing head shot instead of side view", "clearer view of facial features", "neutral facial expression", etc.
That's closer to a valid reason but still insufficient. If we were talking about different seasons, then you could argue a newer picture, but since it's still the same season (and character hasn't changed), you're argument is meaningless.