Eugene.bae.902

Your edit summary: "In episode 6x05, Bellamy finds the skeletons of children from the Mission Team Alpha, in the reliquary, meaning that they died during the first Red Sun. There were no descendants of the original Mission Team Alpha. I saw the video of first Red Sun.)"

The claim that "There were no descendants of the original Mission Team Alpha" is unproven.

Bellamy did find child skeletons, but this does not prove all the children from the original Mission Team Alpha died - only that some did. Nor does it prove that all survivors of the first red sun (whether child or adult) were sterile. Unless you can provide evidence that they were all sterile, you don't have proof that there were no descendants.

Hello Eugene.bae.902,

please read the intro on the category "History" page:

being everything that happened long before the day the Delinquents got sent to Earth.

Who can you mark.... Charmaine Diyoze as 'History'? Primes as 'History'?

Please stop!

Thanks

Skai engineer

Hello Eugene.bae.902,

it looks to me you have fun to undo my edits! What is your problem with true facts?

First you deny the power station is under the machine shop (not in the palace),  second you deny the true effect of the tree sap.

Hint: go and read these articles NOW, both facts are written down correctly!

Last chance: go and reword my edit ...... or I have to look for another solution Greetings Skai engineer , I solve problems!

I am an engineer - means nothing in the fantasy world of good stories.
Still ALL authors know that a good story MUST be consistant to itself and / or best to known physics too. 

Here we go: real world basics
- wounds are healing on living objects, true for fauna (human, animals) and flora (plants)
- even on single cells (biological cells) there are natural mechanism to fix mistakes (wounds) in the DNA
- time dilation and lenth contraction are 'welln-known' existing facts (to be tought at University level), introduced before Albert Einstein, but they were proven correct due the work on relativity theory by Albert Einstein - 'old age' in a living object is an effect of over time summarized mistakes in the cell renewal process

- a living object - organism has a limited life time

Fantasy world 'the 100':
- we only know the basic information which the authors deceide to tell us
- true, we do assume that universal physical principles also do exist AND are applied to fantasy worlds like Sanctum
- the temporal flare really seams to be a time-space disturbance, disturb in the fact that time gets accelerated 
- therefore any living object which touches the temopral flare dies due 'accelerated losing live time', to be shown as burned by a real flare
- for a wound on a living object - true isolated to the wound - time acceleration is a positive effect
- to remember: the tree sap itself has NO healing power - the tree sap just accelerates the natural healing process due time dilation - this physic logic also explains why tree sap can NOT heal the old-age arm of Octavia, simple because it is NOT an effect of a wound but due the over time summarized mistake of cell renewal due exposure to the temporal flare.

We are all missing 'the magic' inside the Anomaly, which truely did heal (in term of undo, revert) the old-age arm of Octavia.

With pleasure I will watch again season 6 to recall all the dialogs. Have a good time 'the 100' for ever the best series - Sci-Fi with real universal physics! 

Greetings Skai engineer

Please do a better job communicating with others. That is, if you disagree with someone's edit, go to their message wall and start a discussion. Avoid reverts except in clear-cut cases.

Eugene, I know you're trying to improve the wiki, but you have to work with, not against, the other editors. When I get complaints about a single user from multiple editors, the easiest solution is to block the problematic user – so if you don't want to be blocked, please make sure I don't get any more complaints.

I am aware Shelby Flannery was promoted to series regular, but she is still listed under Guest Starring on that page. So that's why I'm removing her from Guest Starring. Cause she's no longer recurring, but main. She's already listed under Starring. She's listed on there twice and I'm removing the one that no longer applies.

What kind of help your looking for?

Open to help, but need your instructions, a kind guideline! (no technologie, but text layout, styles, etc.....)

br

Skai engineer

Eugene, she is affilated with the Prisoners though! Whether or not a new group is introduced she's still affiliated with the Prisoners and I believe she should be in the category.

Eugene, part of working on a wiki is being able to cooperate with other users. It's about communication. If you can't engage with other users, than you need back off. Your reasoning was ridiculous and I asked you to desist. You have provided no valid reasoning, yet persisting in the edit war. If you can't communicate and can't back off, then you leave me no choice but to block you.

Hi Eugene, my understanding is that you and Wellsworth96 have been having an edit war over James Crockett's infobox image. Personally, I think neither image is optimal for the infobox; I'd prefer a high-quality, forward facing head shot. Wellsworth96 image has the advantage of being higher quality while yours is forward facing.

Regardless of that, I'm quite confused by your justification for your preferred image. You wrote: "I admit, this picture makes me angry, after the haunting memories of him torturing Octavia. I cannot let it be shown on the Category." Your feelings over a character or a specific scene are not valid justifications for why a specific image should or should not be used.

Here are a few examples of valid justifications for a preferred image: "higher quality image", "forward facing head shot instead of side view", "clearer view of facial features", "neutral facial expression", etc.