Thread:Janus100/@comment-28398720-20160726205730/@comment-28398720-20160825085037

I've been explaining my issues with the proposed disclaimer and trying to give various alternatives. You seem to be fixed on using your disclaimer. Are you willing to discuss alternatives?

I was interested in introducing this disclaimer that mentioned CW rights specifically (just as I was interested of doing so for the images) up until I have heard your concerns about its validity.

As for the rest while it was an interesting discussion, I am not willing nor in a position to play lawyer, nor have any reason to consider any of the above as anything other than original research. And like with the images this is why I am not suggesting or considering other legal language alternatives.