Board Thread:Character Discussion/@comment-104.37.210.20-20180115062509/@comment-13022928-20190224174104

208.82.109.30 wrote: 47.186.68.232 wrote: People have the right to their opinions. I dont agree personally but i accept that people are people and i like the show regardless. My issue is how the LGBT bs is being shoved down our throats. Now us straight people are the bad guys. Read these post, homophobes complaining and LGBT acting like this is a win for their cause. Clarke is still a strong character but why are half the characters gay or bi. Its not needed for this type of show. I dont care either way except when people attack others for their own beliefs. There is nothing wrong with being straight. Uh, it reads that you do care, directly. Why are straight relationships needed for this show? I would counter that no intimiate relationships needed to be demonstrated. Also, what's wrong with LGBT people having a win? I think it is exactly that, and it's cool. It's validating. Some people in real life are LGBT, why would any TV show be an exception? Why would any TV writer act like those people don't exist. Especialy one showing the entire redevelopment of society like The 100. Are you also bothered by other minority appearances in TV because they are not what you are? The problem is the 100 has or has had so meany LGBT characters that it's unrealistic. It's fine for the LGBT community to have representation but when half the characters are LGBT it comes off as them shoving it down our throats.