Thread:Fruipit/@comment-26247132-20151221090145/@comment-26247132-20151221171200

Fruipit wrote: Not to mention, once again, it's unencyclopaedic.

You keep on using that word and I'm not too certain you know what it means. An encyclopedia is a reference book to easily assist you with looking up information. So far, your template suggestion would obscure basic information (like episode titles), your quotes suggestion would remove supporting evidence from important articles (like the the timeline or body count), your subheading suggestion would introduce bad grammar and formatting, and your "in-universe" proposal would turn objective, informative summaries into a convoluted and subjective retelling of a story we all already watched onscreen.

It might be helpful if you spent some time reading through the articles on here and getting a feel for how everything is set up before making sweeping suggestions and unnecessary changes that require more work and maintenance just because you (and only you) think this wikia is lazy, ugly, and pointless.

At this point, I'm not sure if you're trolling or being genuine.