Board Thread:Off-Topic Discussion/@comment-5441128-20170405163832/@comment-5441128-20170411161711

Charinfox wrote: For some people, that's a pro though.

From a logical perspective, it keeps population down, maintains job stability, and keeps the "fittiest" alive.

Many socialistic societies have this mentality where at a certain age, certain benefits are limited.

For example in Canada, catherters aren't covered for someone past the age of 65. Speaking about Canada, I have read this and it got me thinking. Turns out that Canadians are tired of this. Who knew? I didn't because I don't really go and ask in public if you are canadian to confirm this to me.