Thread:Wellsworth96/@comment-27794543-20190603071744

First of all, edit summary is not a substitute for having a reference. Readers are not expected to go through page history to find source, especially when edit could be hundreds ago. Sources are expected to be given in the article (except when information is directly from an episode).

Second, listing a website name is insufficient. You have to give link to the exact post.
 * This is bad:
 * This is still bad:
 * This is fine:
 * This is even better:

It's not the responsibility of other editors to go through hundreds of posts. If you're claiming the information as canon, then give the exact source.

Thank you, janus 