Thread:TotallyTinkerbell/@comment-28398720-20160602005916/@comment-28398720-20160602210307

Hello Skyze

Need I remind you that our very first interaction on this wiki was when you bulk reverted my new additions without any explanation, which were eventually reinstated in another section. After that you single-mindedly rejected the notion that Jaha was elected as "speculation", despite the evidence I presented. Which was eventually included after I thought broader community consensus.

Then third time around, you once again bulk reverted new additions, several paragraphs and unrelated changes, with boilerplate explanation about a handful of terms (very productive). Obviously I thank you for "wasting" couple minutes of your time explaining your reasons after the fact, Its not like I spent considerable time researching this and translating/formalizing this into English, and still despite not being convinced by your arguments introduced all your suggestion except one.

And again thank you for "wasting" your time explaining me in-depth your point of view. After going over your post, I understand that you are passionate on the topic of minorities, sensitive to certain terms regardless of context, and don't like how people might interpret them in relation to Sky people. Still, all I asked time and time again was an alternative term or cornice description to improve the entry.

And I am glad to know that your longest edit streak in a while, that followed on the heel of our disagreement and focused solly on entries I worked on, wasn't to make a point.