Thread:TotallyTinkerbell/@comment-27794543-20161009233140/@comment-7971816-20161011131855

Well I have nothing against individual sourcing and/or the usage of refs. I thought you were talking about sourcing like one would do when writing research paper (author, date of publishment,....). That might have been my bad for interpreting it wrongly, but I've been writing a lot of those papers myself since I'm in the middle of college atm.

But yeah, I have nothing against individual refs. And I'm definetly not pulling an admin card here so the rules wouldn't apply to a page mainly contributed to by myself, don't worry. I get that wikipedia/wikia relies on it's information to be verifyable. It makes sense, it's fan-contributed after all.

However to back-track all of it now is not something I have the time for at the moment. And it doesn't take away the problem of double sourcing. Additionally, you're kinda making it seem like I may have made some of this stuff up, and that if it's not sourced it shouldn't be on the wikia so that's kind of putting a negative to all the hard work I put into it.