Board Thread:Spoilers/@comment-26500342-20151214232944/@comment-26500342-20151218231529

Skyzy wrote: Thewritersdiary wrote: This is partly why I'm not a huge fan of Kabby. I mean, could they not have left Abby independent? Does every female character on the show really need to be in a relationship? I'd prefer Clarke doesn't get together with anybody until the very end of the show, or when she's at least mentally and emotionally stable. Yeah, that's my feelings with everyone who pairs Bellamy up with Echo. Can't he have just saved her because that's what he does and not because he wants to get laid by her at some point in the future?

With Kabby, the show's biggest problem is they just don't have enough older people in the cast, so I can understand it even if it does seem a little forced down our throats (besides, I'm a bit in love with S2 Kane myself so I don't blame Abby).

At least there's still the independent and magnificent Indra....unless they kill her off. Yeah, I just don't understand Becho. I feel like the sacrifices they made for each other would almost seem wasted if they became a couple in the future because than it seems like they wouldn't have done it if they weren't "in love" (which they most certainly are not after a two minute on-screen interaction).

About Kane, I have to agree with that, haha! Maybe it's partly because I loved his character, Desmond, on Lost so much!

I really, really hope they don't screw up Indra's independence. That would extraordinarily irritate me.