Thread:Panorama500/@comment-26247132-20160609030319/@comment-26247132-20160615005012

In response to their post, they edited MY edits off the Cerberus page first, so if anyone is "hounding" anyone else, it's them. Secondly, undoing BAD edits is not "admin action." Everyone on this wiki has the access to undo edits. When over 50% of the previous edit needs to be removed, revised, or re-added, that's causing unnecessary work for other editors, hence the reason there is an undo function.

They have done nothing but cause arguments and bicker with other users. They have already been exceedingly rude to one admin (me) when I tried to initially HELP THEM with their bad edits and then continued to be exceedingly rude to another admin (you) when you warned them about their bad edits and told them to stop harassing me.

As to everything else they said, again I will point out Wikipedia's neutral POV link that explains exactly what is wrong with using slanted words like "recruit" for people who are forcibly captured, imprisoned, and drugged. These are things that ARE ALREADY POLICY and are not me "pushing my opinion through as admin action."

"Articles should be informative, unbiased, and factual rather than speculative. Articles should not include personal opinion."

If they want to make this wiki full of speculation and biased POV, then they are the ones who need to start a discussion to get the rest of the community to agree, not me.