Thread:Janus100/@comment-25205238-20190822211653/@comment-36180144-20190823051038

Hey, as long as we're hashing things out nicely, can we please not mark things "revert vandalism" unless they're actually vandalism?

Please sort me out if I'm wrong, but the policies here say to assume good faith. Not that my assumptions are perfect, but I've seen a pattern of "revert change ######, Vandalism" when it appears the edit was in good faith. Possibly there's a subjective disagreement about the change, possibly it's objectively incorrect - but unless it's vandalism as defined by this wiki's policies or common sense stuff... seems dodgy & confusing to call it vandalism.

(Came up in this 2-week-long argument, from what I'm seeing in the Revision History, and also places like https://the100.fandom.com/index.php?title=Russell_Lightbourne&diff=190919&oldid=190918 for example)