Thread:TotallyTinkerbell/@comment-28398720-20160815200152/@comment-28398720-20160819014324

Most articles templates aren't protected, as is the common practice and with which I strongly agree. And templates that are permanently protected, should probably use separate documentation templates so it can be updated.

Given your concerns above IMO the only template of the three above that need to be permanently protected is CSSGradient, since it is transcluded in most other templates. And for which I linked above a suggestion and noted that it type need to be updated.

The proactive way sound nice in theory, but it start to break down once i start PM you with minor housekeeping\fixes like: add to category or change x->y task. Which in my rather long experience with wikis it is annoying to all involved and always ends up with shortcuts\neglect.