Board Thread:Character Discussion/@comment-104.37.210.20-20180115062509/@comment-2604:6000:1009:C797:DC32:86F8:6222:3F8C-20190129150521

Finn and Clarke was literally a forced relationship to introduce an old lazy trope that epitomizes bad writing (love triangles are trash, if you like them that's fine people like garbage but it is garbage).. it didn't make sense, he was in a relationship with someone who had a real history with him.. but we're gonna throw it all away for a girl he knew for about 4 days according to Raven.. and his character seemed to be created specifically to add unecessary relationship drama to pad a show that had more than enough forced tension between the adults and the kids and Clarke's friend who let her believe he was responsible for her father's death etc.. etc..

ALL of which is just bad/lazy writing causing forced tension.. because apparently the world they created wasn't interesting enough.. they really felt the need to insert a love triangle.. and instead of complaining about that.. you're gonna complain about a "forced" relationship between two women.. which just exposes the real reason you're opposed to the LGBT relationships..

As others have said.. the fact that LGBT characters need to be justified where Non-LGBT characters require no such justification or are flat out ignored when people want to point out LGBT characters.. shows the double standard.. for the record I think 90% of relationships in TV and Movies are forced.. these are not the scenes I remember and love to watch over and over again.. I tend to skip them on repeat viewings.. (not saying all of them are bad.. just that the vast majority are.. and singling out LGBTQ ones as if they need to be justified more than non-LGBTQ ones tells us that your disclaimer of not hating that community is just lip service to make yourself seem less biased than you actually are)