User blog comment:HedaKomTrikru/Comparing The 100 to Lost/@comment-50.169.33.251-20151117062602

on the negative side one of the best parts of lost was characters had very fluid smooth transitions from good to bad. like if you had a graph of good and bad it would be a smooth curve.

no character other then the man in black was never really depicted as pure good or pure bad.

everyone did good and bad things everyone had snapping points. everyone had a bit of darkness and lightness.

t he 100 trys to copy this but fails at times

instead of the smooth change from bad to good or good to bad they flip like a switch. making a very gaged graph. For example muphy suddenly being a good guy and acting like he was only bad because people tried to kill him(when he tried to kill 3 people even before anyone tried to kill him) further finn going from negoshating and talking and never wanting to hurt anyone including the person who just tried to kill him into a guy that guns down children because they moved.

both of those would be great things and amazing character development if they took their time with it. except the killing kids part have him kill adults I feel like the kids part of it is a bit silly finn was like jack in lost he was the good guy and he went into the others village to save her and put his gun to peoples heads to save her. But instead of showing this change in a reasonable rate he goes and mows pepole down. Imagine if that happened in the second season of lost? Jack just goes on a killing spree. It would have felt so wrong no matter what the case.

I love the 100 and it is the closest thing we have to lost right now but there are still a cople huge flaws with it like this