Thread:Janus100/@comment-28398720-20160726205730/@comment-28398720-20160824103133

Fair use doesn't exclude for-profit use, but does distinguish between non-profit educational and commercial use. And that is what I think this notice was trying todo. Your argument that "may not be reproduced commercially without permission from The CW" implying anything other what stated in the first line and reaffirming CW commercial rights, relies on your opinion that first line don't qualify. Meanwhile you suggest to copy GOT "may request..." would mean that we don't have right and falsely implies we have permission, otherwise why are we using it.

I still like secondhand experience, it simply means that we reproduce scripts based on what we seen on screen and not from reading them, which involves Actors\producers performance\interpretation followed by our own, and while our scene descriptions are still lacking, they were part of the format from the start, it is just WIP. I think this important to note because much of what I seen of fair use relies on many clauses with subjective quantity. If it was as simple as you sketch out, i'd expect wikia would have lost law suit by now and removed pretty much all of its media content.

Anyway, as much as it was fun to play hypothetical lawyer, I think this run its course.