Board Thread:Character Discussion/@comment-26247132-20150810212747/@comment-25176701-20150810214234

"He was a cocky show-off"

Just like Bellamy in the beginning of S1.

He was always whining, complaining, and disagreeing about everything to anyone who would indulge him.

That's because the Delinquents always wanted to take the violent route to solving their problems. He strongly disagreed with violence, and was bothered and disturbed by the slightest thought of it. He wanted to go the route opposite of mostly everyone else: The peaceful route.

"He tossed all the rations in the fire instead of figuring out it was just the jobi nuts causing the hallucinations. Besides, what gives him the right to decide for the rest of the Delinquents that they don't get to enjoy getting high off jobi nuts recreationally if they want?"

1. He only tossed the jobi nuts.

2. The second part of your statement actually made me laugh. They may as well legalize drugs. Why not? What gives the government the right to deny people the pleasure of getting high off of them recreationally purposes only? Maybe it's because, oh, I don't know, while under hallucinations somebody can hurt or kill themselves or others by mistake? I mean, really, did you honestly need that one explained to you?

"He set up a meeting with the Grounders but held Clarke hostage to his will by not telling her where or any other details so she had to follow along with him and "trust" him".

Haven't we been through this? The Delinquents, with the exception of a few, wanted nothing but violence. Bellamy brought guns and that led to disaster, since it was the guns that RUINED the peace meeting.

And about the Clarke and Raven points, didn't you say "Skipping over the cheating"? Or did you forget by the time you finished your post? Anyway, we've been through that one, too. I'm not going to bring the same discussion back up.