Thread:Wellsworth96/@comment-27794543-20180426070107/@comment-27794543-20180427105359

Simpler... as in from the editor perspective?

Code-wise, it's 🇨🇴 🇨🇴
 * Item 1
 * Item 2
 * Item 3
 * Item 4
 * Item 5
 * Item 6

vs


 * Item 1
 * Item 2
 * Item 3


 * Item 4
 * Item 5
 * Item 6

As an editor you don't have to count number of items for the split when using Template:Col (which is especially useful for larger lists). Typing-wise, Template:Col is also shorter, requiring less effort to write. So I'm not quite understanding how Template:Col-being/2/end is simpler – could you explain? Also, does it justify the worse reader experience?