Board Thread:News and Announcements!/@comment-7971816-20160509192405/@comment-4944066-20160510122543

To add to my earlier remark, it seems like a lot of the users are focusing on what was 'apparently' said by Skyzy to TotallyTinkerbell and Skyzy's personal opinions on the wikia.

1) We as the users were not privy to the conversation between the two admins so to condemn either admin would be a grave misjustice considering its one word against another.

2) Whilst I am not saying this on a negative part of Tinkerbell, she has not been contributing for the whole third season. So we have lacked her 'personal opinions' on the show in the worst season the show has had. How is it fair that we criticise Skyzy's opinions solely due to the absence of the other admin. It should clearly by a non-issue.

I think adminship should be based on the quality of that person chosen and their edits towards the wikia. Whilst I completely understand that Tinkerbell took time off for mental illness and completely sympathise with her, I think it be a wrong move to force Skyzy out considering her hard work over the last year.

I agree with the Panorama500, maybe a third admin is needed in order to rule down on the decisions for the wikia if an action cannot be decided upon. But in terms of the breakdown of the personal matters between the admins... I reiterate what I and a few other members have said previously...it should be dealt with privately and in a civil manner.