Thread:Skyzy/@comment-26525483-20151228163808/@comment-3026053-20151228182340

ChancellorOfLights wrote: As you can see, it's a joke. I apologize if you take umbridge. The combination of your remark, your factually inaccuracies on Fruipit's address, and then Skyzy's reply to you did indeed lead me to conclude that this is not a really welcoming place. Which is a shame, as the show is awesome, and I would've liked to contribute, but I'm also not one to force my presence on anyone, and I can tell when a community doesn't want my help. So be it, no hard feelings, just a bit saddened and disappointed at how it turned out.

Skyzy wrote: I understand ChancellorOfLights' concern because it does seem suspicious that three new editors show up within the same week from the same wikia. There is so much I could say about this in terms of assuming good faith on my part -because let's face it, my "offense" is that I come from the same wiki as Fruipit ... But I'll digress. As a someone with a background in law studies, I also know when there is a point to further discussion about something and when there is not, because you so adamantly cling to a factually wrong conclusion of "Fruipit had a complete disregard for the pre-existing layout of this wikia and insulted it and other users while making mass edits that caused me a lot of wasted time over three days while I followed behind her cleaning up her mess." You will not listen to reason, so I will not waste time being here, unless my own work as a VSTF brings me to this wiki again -as I have done in the past. It's just a shame that a future administrator is just so willing to label someone a vandal and a troll when that was clearly not the case, just because said user did some things a little different and apparently just tried to correct a linguistic error on this wiki, namely the inconsistency of how APA is applied here. But as said before, the only thing I can conclude about all that is that it truly is this wiki's loss to block such a trusted and powerhouse editor.

Skyzy wrote: You have done a few mass edits ignoring the pre-existing layout. I literally made eight edits. That's a mass? Seriously?

Skyzy wrote: ignoring the pre-existing layout. I guess I fell into the same trap than as Fruipit: I based my edits on the Layout Guide, which said nothing about a preference of boldening the quote section. As such, I assumed that the linking to the own page was an error, as it is bad SEO practice and just unnecessary, or an oversight, since only one name of the speakers in the quote section was boldened.

Skyzy wrote: I don't know enough about your quaility of work to make any judgment but it's unfortunate your timing had to be on the heels of someone who left a bad taste in everyone's mouth. You indeed don't know anything about me, but yet felt comfortable enough to immediately assume a standoffish attitude. Considering how you also treated Fruipit, I can see that you're in general quick to make bad faith assumptions, which is a shame, as your own contributions speak very well of you, so it's a bit weird to have both those sides there.

But I apologize for all this. I did not intend to bring any kind of drama to this wiki. I merely intended to help out a wiki about a show that I love. It seems that my efforts are labeled "more trouble than they're worth", so I will respect that opinion and leave well enough alone, as I don't want to be treated in the same manner Fruipit was, nor do I want to put the community through that.

So I wish this wiki all the best and I hope you all have a festive end of year!