Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-28398720-20160816081959/@comment-27794543-20160918101249

TotallyTinkerbell wrote: ... worthyness has no relation to if the navbox should be created ... I know they're not doing any harm ... I agree, if the navbox does happen then more people will edit ... Okay, so is that "lets add the proposed navbox to the pages" or is it "lets wait for six months, then when everyone forgets about this conversation, add the navboxes then"?

What are we waiting for? If it's discussion on the styling, that can easily be changed at any time, editing only the template. If it's discussion on whether we should even have a navbox, how many weeks are we suppose to wait for people to object?

Bugthe wrote: There HAVE BEEN those template pyramids are an AFFRONT to my eyes! ooh wait, we are talking about navigation.. I fully support those hatnote templates like I support having navboxes. If this wikia didn't have so many colors and styling (be plain white like Wikipedia), then I would support having the plain hatnotes (like Wikipedia has). But that's not the case here, so we have to make the hatnotes a bit more visible. However, I don't mind if the border is made thinner (e.g. 0.5px) or duller green border is used (e.g. #556b2f) or if we had a way of combining multiple hatnotes into one bordered segment (like Wikipedia has Template:Multiple issues). But if we want to discuss changing hatnotes, we should start a separate thread for that – keep this thread focused on navboxes.