Talk:Clarke and Bellamy/@comment-137.164.229.164-20160114175629/@comment-26247132-20160114194337

Ugh! Not with Lexa, either. That makes less logical sense than Bellamy. At least with Bellamy, they're co-leaders. With Lexa, they're leaders of two different groups. I know most of the Clexa fans say that a political marriage would make it work but...really? Think about how antiquated and patriarcial political marriages are. Why take two powerful women and reduce one of them into chattel? Besides, you think either the Sky People or the Trikru would continue having good faith and trust in a leader who was literally sleeping with the enemy (even if they become allies again, Lexa's betrayal at Mount Weather show why that's still a conflict-of-interest).

Clexa would work if either Clarke or Lexa gave up leadership and that's it. Since I don't want to see either of them giving up leading their people, I'm also anti-Clexa.