Board Thread:Spoilers/@comment-96.228.137.74-20160311185338/@comment-26247132-20160427163028

Redlion14 wrote: Well I got a reply from the author of the article, Selina Wilken:

"I agree, but I don't think that's a problem, per se. This pledge is LGBT-specific (not even the + is included), but it's still an example of the power of the audience. I think it's symbolic of all minority representation, and as the pledge states, it's meant as a first step." At least she's aware on how limited this pledge really is. I agree it's nice visibility but it still really doesn't do much in terms of minority representation, either for LGBTQ+ or POC.