Thread:Skyzy/@comment-16845200-20160125222527/@comment-16845200-20160126001705

well, i'm clearly late to that discussion but a problem i see with that - i don't think they'd be applicable to all pages? like obviously they'd be applicable to the character pages (and even then i'd say it's a bit iffy), but take the relationships pages, for instance. for the clarke and finn page, logically all the other clarke (romantic, i would presume) relationship pages like clarke and lexa would be listed under the see also. but there wouldn't be any point in listing something like "octavia and lincoln" underneath it, which the relationship navbox would include, and sticking it under the "see also" header would require someone to sift through a bunch of other links in the navbox simply to get to the ones that're most related to "clarke and finn". but those are just my two cents on the issue and? am i safe in saying that you've already decided the navboxes are a thing?

i'm kind of busy with school right now (and...probably will be through may #_#) but i'd be willing to format everything after my workload lightens up.