Talk:Final Conclave/@comment-27794543-20170508003219/@comment-27794543-20170509052846

You stated: "I'm not looking for an argument today, so I respect your opinion and I hope you respect mine". At that time the killed by info had been removed from that page. You unilaterally decided to end the discussion with the page your preferred way. Also saying that I should respect your opinion.

So what does that mean? Does that mean "do whatever you want"? Because I couldn't decipher that. So I kindly asked you to clarify. My exact words: "If you're uninterested in having a discussion, then is that your consent for inclusion of killed by information?" Reminder: on wikis, when two or more editors disagree, they have a discussion. You said you weren't interested in talking, so I asked for your permission to proceed.

At which point, you did not clarify your statement to mean "do whatever you want". Instead you argued that the information was small and unimportant, that details about this event belong on other pages instead of the page about the event. I kindly asked if I had your permission – you rejected it.

You chose to enter this discussion. Your "kindly" way of ending the discussion left the page your preferred way and you refused to give me permission to proceed. You say you never blamed me, yet you also said "I only continued in this argument because you" which sounds awfully like you blaming me.

You don't like me refuting your statements, then stop giving me reason to. Feel free to end this any time. I'm not forcing you to do anything.