Talk:Clarke Griffin/@comment-152.135.148.124-20141031143544/@comment-138.237.240.152-20141105160828

My biggest problem with the show's first season was onthe back and forth moral of the show on if it is better to tell people the truth (as represented by Clark and Abby) or is better to keep the truth from people (as represented by Bellamy and Kane). The best example of this was in Murphey's Law where Clarke confronted Murphey about the murder of Wells without enough real evidence believing that the "people ave a right to know." But once she confronted him, everyone wanted to kill Murphey which she didn't think that a bunch of criminals wouldn't try to do. Then she tries to protect Charolette and is trying to keep her from the people. Finally, when Charolette kills herself and Bellamy tries to kill Murphey (which at this point is really Bellamy's fault) she banishes Murphey which is kind of harsh even for Clarke who trhoughout the show wants the people to know the truth so they can reach a decision good for everyone. Are we supposed to side with Clarke in that the people have a right to know, but they clearly can't handle the truth or with Bellamy in that we need to keep the truth from people, but we do it for selfish reasons? This is a huge problem with the show that no one else seems to bring up.