Talk:Finn Collins/@comment-25176701-20150214214208

Tbh, I really can't stand it anymore how people keep commenting that he deserved to die. I want ONE good explanation of why he deserved to die. However, I don't want some stupid explanation that says "He killed innocent people". How were those people innocent anyway? Just because they weren't doing anything at that moment does NOT mean they were innocent. They were warriors and have KILLED people before. They lost their innocence long ago when they took the life of a PERSON for the first time.

There are other reasons why the Grounders aren't innocent, too. For one, they torture people for revenge and turn their children into killers at a young age. How does that make them innocent? It doesn't. Also, 17/18 Grounders tried to kill him FIRST. Finn fought back. Fighting back was the only thing he could. He couldn't run from them. There were too many. The first man who ran was a complete dumbass. If somebody with a gun tells you to stay put you listen. You don't try to run away. The other Grounders who ran after that man must have been even more stupid because they SAW what happened and they continued anyway. Nyko warned the Grounders to stay put and they disobeyed him. Also, the first Grounder who ran could easily have been considered a threat. Think about it: If your back was turned and one of your enemies began running behind you, what would you do? You would probably shoot first. Let's pretend that the first man that ran had a weapon and tried to kill Finn. If he had looked before he shot the gun he could have easily been killed. Finn was just trying to STAY ALIVE. He had no clue if that man had picked up a weapon or what he was doing. All Finn knew was that his enemy was behind him, running. He also knew he had to defend himself in case that man really did have a weapon.

Some people have trouble understanding that he was sick in the head. Somebody sick in the head isn't always capable of choosing to make the right decisions. They sometimes don't even know the difference between right and wrong. Finn did not have control over his mental disorder. How is that in any way his fault? The war that the Grounders started caused Finn to suffer from mental problems, so the whole massacre was their faults.

Finn made one very wrong choice. Yet, people treat him and talk about like he's some evil person. He's not, though. He truly did feel remorse for what he did. Would an evil person feel remorse or willingly give themselves up to the enemy to be punished for their crime? If anyone thinks the answer is yes, then clearly they don't know the definition of the word evil. I suggest using a dictionary or perhaps Google to look up the meaning of the word.

Finn wanted PEACE in the whole first season. He even set up a peace meeting with the enemy. How could somebody that wanted peace so much that they were willing to DIE to make it happen be such a bad person? They can't be.

People need to stop defining Finn based off of one choice that he made. They need to review EVERYTHING Finn has done. All the good things he did certainly outweighed the one bad thing he did. Anyone who can't see this either 1) Never liked Finn to begin with and/or 2) Never paid close enough attention to the episodes. Anyway, how can people judge Finn when they haven't been through something like he has? They have absolutely NO right to judge him if they haven't been through what he has and that's just the TRUTH.