Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-58.6.179.255-20180325015235

I find it very troublesome how they killed Lexa in The 100.

There are many things wrong with it, and it disrupted the flow of the show.

First of all, Lexa was portrayed as a leader and warrior. The way they killed her was just lame. They didn't give her either a leader's or worrior's death. Think about it, after all they build up of Lexa, she died because of a pistol fire misaimed at her in a room. WTF? It would have made much more sense, for example, if she died fighting off successfully but suffer a tragic blow of an ambush (she made a lot of internal enemies at that point) trying to kill her. Anyone can probably think of a dozen ways that is better than the lame scene they pulled off in the show.

Secondly, the timing. I get that they need to move forward with the story of A.I. (Version 2). I thought about this timing over and over and I really don't think that they had to do it there, when the Arkcade and the capital is on the brink of the war and Lexa was the only person who was stopping it. It doesn't make any sense whatsoever that the capital is not fully-attacking the Arkcade even after the Lexa's death.

The 100 was not a perfectly refiend show. It had its imperfections but they were acceptable if you were being lenient about it. And I genuinly enjoyed the show so far (except the character change of Bellamy, because the rate of change of his character was not acceptable. They totally created a new character). But ever since they killed the character Lexa in such a way, it became illogical, without the story, and it became similar to what happened to the Waling Dead: stroy went out the door and just revolved around endless cycle of struggle, politics, etc.

I watched two more episodes after that but I think they torally killed the flow of the story (at least for me they did) and I don't think it's acceptable so that I can watch it further.  