Talk:Second Nuclear Apocalypse/@comment-31.0.67.106-20180809055857

Wait, wait, wait, is there a particular reason all those reactors even had enough fuel to sustain themselves for so many years?

Present-day designs require 20+ tons of enriched fuel *per year*, and these were supposed to be some "mega-reactors". What, are we supposed to believe anyone would waste ridiculous amount of money by stocking them for a 100 years for no particular reason? Talk about frozen funds.

And that doesn't even touch the question of various contingencies and most people not exactly dying the very second of nuclear war. YA logic...