Talk:Second Nuclear Apocalypse/@comment-31.0.67.106-20180809055857/@comment-2A02:1812:1C2E:F200:A1EB:F1BF:D7F4:8E42-20190428195906

yeah i also highly doubt the scientific accuracy of nucli reactors being able to sustain themselves for 100 years. even if the reactors survived the nuclear devestation you have to supply the nuclear reaction with more fuel during all that time. it's not like the nuclear reaction just keeps building even if you don't supply it with fuel. a nuclear reaction isn't self-sustaining. a second apo is highly unlikely. you'd just be left with a pile of radioactive waste not a death wave. the sci-fi excuse doesn't work here either. this show is rooted in modern day technology with just a bit more oomph. a self-sustainin nuclear reaction is not that.