Thread:Fruipit/@comment-4760310-20151223021040/@comment-4760310-20151224141944

I never 'demanded' changes be made. I made a suggestion, on the suggestion page. I edited minor things in the layout guide, and, additionally, I was never given a warning. No one ever came to me and said, 'hey this isn't how we do things'. It was always a reversion, with no explanation.

How is asking a question 'questioning your authority'. I wanted to know whether the members of the community have any say in the actual election of an admin. It certainly wasn't meant to imply that you don't have good judgement. I was asking a question.

One of the first lines in the policy is that the wiki "practices open-mindedness and assumes good faith". I certainly don't feel as though that has been the case. You blocked me without having spoken to me since April of this year, when I was here last. I offered suggestions for changes then, too.

And the 'hypercorrections', as you called them, were simply a formatting error, and, more importantly, an accident. A mistake.

Yes, I have knowledge of coding. However, I didn't know that you centered the plot subheading. I wasn't 'ignoring' the wiki's rules regarding coding because, upon looking at the layout guide, there is absolutely nothing there that talks about centering the content in the plot subheading.

If you agreed with another user's opinion that my behaviour was inappropriate, it would have been nice to be alerted //before being blocked. How was I supposed to know and correct it, if the only person I'm talking to is one who hadn't bothered to elaborate on certain things anyway – like the fact that the APA formatting for headings was incredibly important, but that APA style itself is not in use on the wiki.