Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-27794543-20160920042212

So in NavboxRelationships‎, why are "Friendly Relationships" only male-female? Any male-male & female-female "friendly" relationships are listed in generic "Male Relationships" & "Female Relationships". If romantic relationships don't care about gender, why should friendly ones?

Btw: I just added an enemy section, since I didn't see a place to add "Clarke and Jasper" and "Murphy and Ontari". While the non-friendly same-gender relationships went into the generic "Male Relationships" & "Female Relationships" groups, there was no place for opposite-gender non-friendly relationships.

Honestly, I'm not convinced about the entire sorting system.
 * If gender is irrelevant, then move the friendly same-gender relationships into "Friendly Relationships".
 * If we want to sort by genders,
 * Either have generic "Male–Female Relationships" to match "Male Relationships" and "Female Relationships". This way we can move all the non-friendly relationships into each gendered category.
 * Or have the names specify the gender & friendliness, i.e. "Male–Female Friendly Relationships", "Male Friendly Relationships", and "Female Friendly Relationships".
 * Regardless, move the section down to be next to the same-gender ones. Having "Family Relationships" in between makes it seem that we value male-female friendly relationships more than same-gender relationships. 